O que os doutores precisam saber sobre tecnologia mRNA e que não lhes foi dito!
So the mRNA “vaccine” is not mRNA? What doctors need to know about mRNA technology and have not been told
- PORT-BR 2. ENGLISH
PORT-BR
Aos que entendem alguns conceitos médicos, ou tem a quem recorrer, antes
de se aventurar a ler um artigo científico, sugiro lerem as notas pessoais do
Dr. Dermeval Reis Júnior, que será o suficiente!
Pelo menos agora entendi do porquê se acha via Google artigos tão
veementes, dizendo que as vacinas mRNA não são perigosas… pois bem… é que não
contaram tudo aos médicos… e muito menos para os pacientes…
BUSCANDO AJUDA EM ETAPAS
Depois de ler o suficiente do artigo do Dr. DEMERVAL (Então a “Vacina”
de mRNA não é mRNA…) do link acima, precisa ler o post O PERIGO DA PROTEINA SPIKE e buscar ajuda,
conforme explicado no final, pois o PERIGO É REAL – mais detalhes chaves no
post sobre AVELOZ – A CURA DO CÂNCER – vai entender
lendo…
E não adianta começar a tomar por conta CHÁ DE ERVA-DOCE, por exemplo;
sem a dose certa você nunca saberá se ela foi suficiente ou é suficiente…
Sobretudo, antes de tudo, faça o TESTE DÍMERO-D. SE tiver perto do valor
500, leia o post NATTOKINASE (clique no nome para mais detalhes). E daí busque um
médico para fazer um DETOX DA PROTEÍNA modRNA (e não mRNA – agora sabemos), que
além de não lhe dar imunidade alguma, ainda vai roubar sua imunidade e…
conforme for, sua vida! Mesmo que a médio ou longo prazo, com doenças
dissimuladas… Abrindo todos os posts acima e vendo os vídeos curtos em alguns e
as poucas imagens nelas, saberá mais!
ENGLISH
translations of parts of the long article by deepl
(without revision):
https://medicospelavidacovid19.com.br/opiniao/entao-a-vacina-de-mrna-nao-e-mrna/
This is a translation (the link in Port-Br), with
additions, by Dr Dermeval Reis Junior inspired by the original article by molecular
biologist Klaus Steger:
About Dr. Dermeval Reis Junior
At least now I understand why one finds via Google
such vehement articles saying that mRNA vaccines are not dangerous… well… it’s
just that doctors have not been told everything… let alone the patients…
PARTS TRANSLATED
What would your reaction be to learn that the
mRNA-based ‘vaccine’ technology was nothing more than a Trojan horse, because
it contains no mRNA, but a modRNA, which genetically manipulates healthy cells?
Come with me on this journey, let’s understand the
health damage they have done, how manipulative Big-Pharma is, and how
manipulated the populations have been, both by Big-Pharma and by governments
and their nefarious health agencies, and by health organizations from various
professional segments.
Then, a few years ago, the term “mRNA” was confined mainly to scientific
circles and research papers. The use of messenger RNA seemed promising: in
theory, it would teach cells how to synthesize a protein that would initiate an
immune response against a specific pathogen. This was the thesis. Today, many
of us have heard of mRNA, as the Pfizer-BioNTech and Modern Covid-19 ‘vaccines’
use messenger ribonucleic acid, or mRNA, as the active ingredient. At least,
that’s what we’ve been told. The term then came out of confinement and started
to be read, spoken, understood in every home around the world.
In fact, the mRNA-based ‘vaccine’ technology, as
thought and according to the thesis presented, uses the RNA code of the
SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S protein). And under this idea, in an unprecedented way and
contrary to all the precepts of immunology, 5 doses have already reached the
arms of the population. Yes, dear citizen, the [supposed] Covid-19 ‘vaccines’,
which are nothing more than a gene therapy injected into the arms without
authorization of the inoculated, have been sold as an innovative mRNA
‘vaccine’, only they are not mRNA!
[…]
“Fake” mRNA – modRNA – can have three problems:
It can increase errors when producing spike
proteins –
Worthy of note, it has been reported that synthetic
methyl-pseudouridine, which replaces natural uridine, increases the rate of
transcription errors , i.e. one error for every 4,000 nucleotides – one error
for every molecule of “vaccine” synthesized.
Active ingredients vary greatly in different
batches
Another factor of concern is the unusually wide “tolerance level” of the
active ingredient. The concentration of modRNA varies from 0.37 mg/ml to a
maximum of 0.63 mg/ml ( pdf ), as shown in the European Medicines Agency (EMA)
Evaluation Report. Such variation is highly unusual for a drug. Furthermore,
the vaccine requires only a minimum of 50% modRNA present as intact molecules
with a complete sequence, which means that there can be up to 3.4-fold
variation of the active substance present in different batches. As one dose of
Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) represents 0.3 ml containing 30 micrograms of
active substance, approximately 13 trillion modRNA molecules will be
transferred into the body per injection.
And the third problem is an even more significant
concern.
This modRNA can be incorporated into the human genome
According to the political narrative, the mRNA from COVID-19 vaccines
does not enter the cell nucleus, where human DNA is located. The narrative also
insists that COVID-19 vaccines do not contain reverse transcriptase, completely
preventing reverse transcription of the mRNA into DNA with subsequent transport
into the nucleus and incorporation into the host genome. Two publications
refuted this.
Liguo Zhang and colleagues added the RNA genome of SARS-CoV-2 in the
absence of reverse transcriptase to aborted human embryonic kidney (HEK293T)
cells. They observed that the cultured cells reverse transcribed the viral RNA
into DNA and integrated this DNA into the cell genome. The authors
suggested a mechanism mediated by LINE-1 (Long Interspersed Nuclear Element-1),
which may act as an endogenous reverse transcriptase. Since LINE-1 represents
approximately 17 percent of the human genome, it is highly likely that reverse
transcription of the administered modRNA is possible.
Markus Aldén and his colleagues added the
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 RNA vaccine (BNT162b2) to human liver cells (Huh7) and
observed reverse transcription in the DNA in as short a period as six hours.
The unique DNA sequence of BNT162b2 was demonstrated in the genome of the
cultured cells, confirming the integration of the reverse transcribed modRNA
into DNA. In addition, an increased core distribution of LINE1 was observed,
corroborating a LINE-1-mediated integration mechanism.
modRNA and its secret by-products
The so-called “RNA-based vaccines” from
Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna contain DNA impurities in addition to the modRNA
active substance. As stated in the EMA Evaluation Report, “the active substance
BNT162b2 [Pfizer’s vaccine] is manufactured by in vitro transcription using a
linear DNA template, produced by plasmid DNA from transformed Escherichia coli
cells.” In a very recent study , researchers demonstrated that DNA
contamination in Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna injections averages 9.1 ng/µl
average DNA concentration versus 33.4 ng/µl average RNA concentration. This
means that approximately a quarter (9.1 / 33.4 x 100 = 27.3 percent) of the
nucleic acids in the vials analyzed can be attributed to DNA impurities. At the same time, the active
substance modRNA accounts for the remaining three-quarters. Plasmids are
circular DNA molecules that can replicate themselves. It is assumed that this
is not the case with linearized DNA. Although the ratio of replication
competent circular DNA plasmids versus linear DNA templates for in vitro modRNA
transcription is still unknown, the DNA concentration is not only several
orders of magnitude above the 330 ng/mg limit as specified by EMA , but also
implies that billions of DNA molecules are transferred per injection of
so-called “RNA-based vaccines”.
This has the following two consequences:
The plasmids usually comprise sequences that code for antibiotic
resistance; this is essential for the production process to avoid reproducing
other bacteria, which did not contain the sequences that code for the spike
protein. In this case, the kanamycin can be exchanged for other bacteria,
increasing the risk of developing multi-resistant germs.
DNA impurities have the potential to become incorporated into the genome
of the recipient cell and can consequently cause mutations that are followed by
aberrant gene expression. Reverse transcription by LINE1 is no longer a
mandatory step for the integration of spike protein coding sequences into the
genome. Reverse transcription of modRNA into DNA followed
by genome integration is the longest pathway. However, there may be an
additional short pathway, i.e. direct integration of DNA contaminants. Both
sequences (RNA and DNA) encode the spike protein.
Finally, the in vitro transcription process will
also result in truncated RNA species as product-related impurities, which will
result in the synthesis of imperfect spike proteins.
Sleep through this noise!
This is a translation, with additions, by Dr
Dermeval Reis Junior inspired by the original article by molecular biologist
Klaus Steger.
Comentários
Postar um comentário